In 1995 I received a copy of Numismatics in the News: Gleanings from ContemporaryNewspapers. The compiler explored newspaper articles as a source for numismatic research.

Now I have a subscription to a service that provides access to many, but not all, of the country'snewspapers. This is a very valuable tool for the type of research I do.

Occasionally there may be a question about the first time something was mentioned. This week Ilooked into the first times the word was found in this newspaper collection.

The first reference to was published in The (London) Morning Chronicle forFebruary 25, 1834. This was an advertisement for Descriptive Catalogue of Rare and UneditedRoman Coins by J. Y. Akerman, F.S.A. The book and Ackerman were mentioned in eighteenadditional articles in England in 1834.

The July 26, 1837. issue of The Philadelphia Inquirer used the word for the firsttime in an American paper. However, the article had been picked up from a British newspaper.American papers continued to run articles based on stories from England and Europe.

The (London) Times had an ad dated February 20. 1851, offering a publication called TheNumismatist. There was a similar ad in The Morning Chronicle for February 27, 1851. Did thatever succeed?

On March 20, 1851, Professor D. E. Groux ran an ad in the New York Daily Herald. He offered4000 coins and medals for sale through a temporary location in New York. The name of Grouxshould be familiar to bibliophiles.

An ad was placed in the New York Tribune of May 22, 1852, by W. L. Shaw, a name unfamiliarto me. I wonder if the average reader of the paper knew what a numismatist is. More to the point,would the average coin collector in 1852 know what a numismatist is?

I contributed a listing of to the Summer 2004 issue of TheAsylum. W. L. Shaw was not included on the list.

Q. David Bowers compiled American Numismatics Before the Civil War 1760-1860, published in1998. Bowers mentions Groux across several pages but does not mention Shaw.

The 1850 Census did not provide an obvious match.

The Boston City Directory for 1852 has three listings for William Shaw but none of them has themiddle initial 'L'.

Shaw expressed an interest in acquiring a cent dated 1815. Since none were produced, it islogical that he did not have one. What reference could a numismatist check in 1852 to learn thatnone were made?

By 1850, Boston had a population of 136,381. Would the Post Office have been able to delivermail without a first name or a street address? They couldn't look him up in the city directory.

The American hobby of numismatics changed in 1857. This was mentioned in newspapers of thetime. An article in the Daily Evening Express for May 26, 1857, mentioned new cents beingexchanged for old at the Philadelphia Mint.

The October 7, 1857, issue of (Philadelphia) Public Ledger offered,

In 1857 and 1858, additional ads ran in Public Ledger offering coins and U. S. pennies for sale.Replies were to be addressed to C. W. at the Ledger office. This may have been Charles Warner,a known dealer of the period.

I tried a search for similar terms like coin collector, coin collection and coin dealer. This provedto be quite frustrating. The site gave me matches to "corn", "comm" and even "coffin". There were toomany false hits to justify continued searching.

It would appear, anyway, that the term 'numismatist' eventually caught on while the term 'virtuosos'has faded from usage.

To read the earlier E-Sylum articles, see:
NUMISMATIC GLEANINGS FROM CONTEMPORARY NEWSPAPERS(https://www.coinbooks.org/esylum_v13n42a11.html)
NEWMAN PORTAL: SELLING COINS BY LOTTERYs(https://www.coinbooks.org/v21/esylum_v21n22a11.html)