Those interested in the artists behind the designs on U.S. coins andcurrency may like to know about a special exhibit curated by the MilwaukeeArt Museum, Thomas Sully: Painted Performance.As described by the museum, "the exhibitionis the first retrospective of the artist in thirty years, and the first toexplore the artist's entire career in depth." Yesterday, my wife and I tookthe opportunity to view the exhibit.

When the exhibit was announced, I reviewed Taxay's U.S. Mint and Coinage and Vermeule's Numismatic Art in America for their coverage of the evolution of the Seated Liberty or "Gobrecht" coinage. I had forgotten about Clain-Stefanelli's excellent article in the ANA Centennial Anthology - thank you to Edward Carmody and The E-Sylum for bringing back to my attention that work.

While the concept of a seated Liberty for the coinage clearly belongs toMint Director Patterson, the design executed by Gobrecht clearly owes itsgreatest debt to Sully's drawing but also includes elements, especially theposition of the arm and the shield, from Titian Peale's. (The Milwaukeeexhibit includes an excellent portrait of Titian's father, Charles WillsonPeale by Sully).

The exhibition of course makes no mention of Sully's involvement with thecoinage, dealing as it does with Sully's painted works, and the coinagedrawing would have been a minor sidelight to his career. It does, however,include one of Sully's portraits of Andrew Jackson that later became thesource for the engraving on the 20-dollar bill.

As to Mr. Carmody's assertion that the seated Liberty design was "was largely determined by President Andrew Jackson", I would await documentary evidence. Teddy Roosevelt notwithstanding, I think to most presidential office-holders the minutiae of coinage design would be of passing interest.

So should we really call this series "Gobrecht" coinage? His name is aconvenient moniker as his work was the common denominator translating theimages of Sully, Peale, (and later, I presume, Robert Ball Hughes' versionof seated Liberty) into coinage dies. The inspiration however belongselsewhere.

What about the removal of Gobrecht's name from the base of Liberty? Is itpossible Sully objected to Gobrecht taking credit for the work? TheMilwaukee exhibit demonstrates Sully's keen awareness of the art market ofthe time. Sully created sample paintings as "marketing tools", and thesealways include Sully's initials TS and the date.

Clain-Stefanelli illustrates and comments on a rather mysterious painting that reproduces the seated Liberty of Gobrecht's final design, but with Sully's initials TS and the date 1836. A subtle claim to authorship? Questions probably forever unanswerable.

I'm sorry this note is so late: the exhibition in Milwaukee runs onlythrough January 5, 2014, but then travels to the San Antonio Museum of Art,February 7-May 11, 2014.

For more information on the Sully exhinit, see:Thomas Sully: Painted Performance(mam.org/thomas-sully/)

To read the earlier E-Sylum article, see:ROBERT M. PATTERSON AND THE SEATED LIBERTY DESIGN(www.coinbooks.org/esylum_v16n51a18.html)