The introductory article by our own Julia Trocmé-Latter provides an enjoyable introduction to this important partof Roman coinage. Roman Empresses filled many roles in the Roman Empire, not unlike modern-day PresidentialFirst Ladies. There are stark contrasts to their modern-day counterparts as well. But the importance of these FirstLadies is implicit by the sheer numbers of coins struck in their honor.

The extensive use of First Lady portraits on coinage comes to a zenith in the 2nd and 3rd centuries AD beginningwith Faustina Senior and extending through the reign of Elagabalus. We have focused not only on exceptionalportrait styles but have included many interesting reverse types as well. It is often through the reverse themes thatwe learn the most about how Roman rulers wanted to have their first ladies recognized. These reverses includevirtues, family promotion, and occasionally specific references to glorify projects promoted by these first ladies.It is a fascinating area to study and collect. We hope you enjoy this special edition.

The very presence of imperial women on Roman coins speaks to the desire of the ruling dynasty to cast itself as an idealizedRoman family. At this time, the most important public role for women was materfamilias, whose societal function was to bearand rear children (particularly sons) for the Empire. So, the decision to feature the wives of emperors on the imperial currency,even when heirs did not yet exist, served as a promise of dynastic continuity and stability.

Roman society was decidedly male-dominated, with politics and government an exclusively male preserve. Yet women couldand did exert a powerful influence behind the scenes, serving as advisors and sounding boards for their political husbands andfathers. And, from the third century on, there were several periods when de facto feminine control of government was more orless accepted by all levels of society.

Living women associated with powerful men had been appearing on Roman coins (as opposed to provincial coins, where therules were more flexible) since the Second Triumvirate, but almost always disguised as goddesses or allegorical figures. MarkAntony's first wife Fulvia, who was very politically active, was portrayed as Victory on silver quinarii struck before her death in40 BC. Octavia, Antony's next wife, appeared on provincially struck coins with her husband without any pretence of disguise(it helped that she was the sister of Antony's co-ruler Octavian and thus served as a symbol of their short-lived partnership).Still, the "disguised portrait" convention continued into the early Empire, with Augustus's daughter Julia depicted as Diana, orhis wife Livia as the personification of Justice or Pax, as early examples. Caligula issued a sestertius with his three sisters on thereverse, all portrayed as allegorical figures considered appropriate for women (namely Securitas, Concordia, and Fortuna), butthe identity of the three cannot be contained by their divine guises, as their names are unambiguously arranged around them.

To read the complete issue, see:
Classical Numismatic REVIEW Volume XLV, No. 2 • Summer 2020(https://cngcoins.com/photos/cng_links/CNR_August_2020.pdf)