Pierre Eugene Du Simitière, George Washington Before Boston, obverse and reverse, designs for medal, 1776, The Library Company of Philadelphia

The paper itself is solidly researched and well-written. He did miss my work on Du Simitiere in my dissertation, Curators and Culture: The Museum Movement in America,1740-1870, published by the University of Alabama in 1990, but I won't hold that against him, since I treated more than a dozen representative museums during that timespan. A key word search would not turn up the fact that part of it was about Du Simitiere.

Most of the Du Simitiere material Iachini covers, especially regarding numismatics, has been presented before, principally by Hans Huth, Paul Sifton, and me. Iachini does bringout some new (at least to me) material on Du Simitierie's work on state seals, which is useful. I was able to follow Du Simitiere's numismatic collection to hisco-executor, Ebenezer Hazard, but John Lupia has taken if further, tracing it to another sale in Philadelphia in 1813--but after that, the trail turns cold.

My only substantive criticism of the numismatic portion of the paper, regards the statement Iachini makes on p. 142: "His knowledge and his remarkable collection make himthe first numismatist of the New World." Du Simitiere was not even the first numismatist in North America--Rev. William Bentley was collecting coins and medals in the 1760s,and writing about them by 1765. Samuel Curwen and Rev. Andrew Elliot were in the field at about the same time as Bentley.. I'm not aware of specific numismatists in the Frenchand Spanish colonies of the new world, but given the traditions of the mother countries, and in the Spanish colonies particularly, the vast numbers of coins being produced, Iwould be astonished if there weren't isolated numismatists collecting and writing long before Du Simitiere stepped onto the soil of the new world.

On balance, though, Iachini's work is well-done, and since The Eagle That is Forgotten has been well-nigh forgotten during the 30 years since it waspublished, it certainly couldn't hurt to revisit this topic in The E-Sylum. Reading his work may well inspire new interests in or at least appreciation of, the earlydays of numismatic interest in what has become the United States.

To read the complete paper, see:
Pierre Eugene Du Simitière and the First American NationalMuseum (https://www.academia.edu/14254305/Pierre_Eugene
_Du_Simiti%C3%A8re_and_the_First_American_National_Museum)

Having arrived in the New World as a young painter, illustrator, and translator, and having spent many years researching and collecting, DuSimitière decided to follow the oldEuropean custom of setting up a "Curio Cabinet" containing relics of many types, and gradually to expand his collection until it became "greatly celebrated in America, where it isunrivalled," according to the Marquis de Chastellux who saw it in 1782 (Chastellux 111). Years before its opening to the general public, however, his studio was frequented bytravelers and men of politics, such as Continental Congress member Richard Smith who reported in his diary in 1775 that he had amused himself "all the morning in Du Simitière'smuseum"

When Du Simitière officially opened his sundry collection of Americana to the public in 1782, the exhibition was essentially arranged in "natural" and "artificial" curiositiesthat spanned from specimens and sketches of natural history to modern and antique artifacts. He did not mention (or, if so, probably summarized) his known numismatic collection aswell as his trove of printed materials concerning the history of the Colonies and the American Revolution as "a number of miscellaneous Curiosities of various kinds."

Though short-lived and its founder forgotten soon after his death and burial in an unmarked grave in St. Peter's Church Yard in Philadelphia, Du Simitière's American Museumpredates by three years the one traditionally credited as the first of the republic, founded by the well-known painter Charles Willson Peale in the same city.

A scholar, a voracious collector of books and "curiosities," and the acquaintance of three future presidents of the United States and other major political and military leadersof the time, Du Simitière himself was a "very curious man," as John Adams described him in an oft-quoted letter to his wife; the epithet "curious" is le mot juste for a mansingle-handedly able (and always with limited economic resources) to put together one of the best libraries on the continent and its first historical museum.

In New York, during 1769 and 1770, he became a naturalized citizen and deepened his interest in the colonies' growing controversy with London, beginning his custom of pickingup from the street broadsides, pamphlets, handbills, and newspapers related to the politics of the day. The percentage of the now unique printed items that he gathered together isstaggeringly high; these documents illuminate the revolutionary era as only informal productions of a period can.