In my coin dealing business, customers like to sell me stuff. Couple years ago a guy drove up with a rented U-Haul fully packed with coins he said he'd been collecting since 1949.

More recently another longtime customer sold me his ancient Greek coins. Turned out he'd specialized in the tiniest ones (like 3 to 8 millimeters). I gave him a price he was happy with. Had to work up a new technique to photograph such micro coins for my auctions.

Then he asked if I'd be interested in his Byzantine coins. Love them, said I.

I vividly remember, over 50 years ago, standing in a little shop, chatting with its owner over a tray of coins he'd bought. I said, pointing to one.

Those words afterward reverberated with me. I actually knew nothing about Byzantine coins, except that they did tend to look pretty crappy. Now I wondered if it was possible to find and collect non-crappy ones. (For me quality is the name of the game in numismatics.) Soon enough a mail auction presented an opportunity, and so my Byzantine collection was launched.

The Byzantine Empire began as the Eastern part of the Roman one. After the West fell in 476 AD, the Byzantines flourished for further centuries, followed by a long decline, until 1453, when the Turks conquered their capital, Constantinople (today's Istanbul).

Byzantine gold coins are actually very common and usually very nice. It's the bronzes that are problematic, having been of commerce, suffering much abuse - and were poorly made to begin with. Those are what I've collected. It's a highly interesting series, very varied, with many different types produced at numerous mints. The later ones tend to be scarcer, and even more quality-challenged.

But one can accomplish a lot in five decades, and I now have a pretty comprehensive collection, over 700 different coins (no duplicates), the quality ranging from decent to very nice. The difficult later series is particularly well represented since decades ago I bought the collection of a man who specialized in those...

Anyhow - my customer, who seemed a pretty sophisticated collector, sent me his 85 Byzantine coins, and I was keenly looking forward to this, hoping to add some goodies to my own holdings.

There were indeed some scarce and nice ones I didn't have. One a nummus (my spell checker wants to make this ), the smallest value in the whole Byzantine repertoire, and rarely produced. This particular type, unusually with a facing bust of Justinian I (527-65 AD) and a lion on the reverse, I'd never even seen before, and it's in quite good condition.

Another was minted at Rome, while re-occupied by the Byzantines, who made rather few coins there. Wretched productions at that. This one again is much above average.

As I worked my way through the chronologically arranged box, I said to myself, A catalog number in Sear's definitive book, Byzantine Coins and Their Values. A Follis of Michael III () and Basil I from their brief joint reign, 866-67 AD (the depths of the ), with their facing busts on each side. A distinctive and rare major type that really should be in my collection, but I'd never managed to get one - and it had started to bug me. Like it had become a holy grail. Recently I'd put in what I thought was a strong bid in an obscure online auction, but lost out.

So as that number approached, I crossed my fingers...

To read the complete article, see:
A Byzantine Coin Lover's Frabjous Day(https://rationaloptimist.wordpress.com/2024/04/03/a-byzantine-coin-lovers-frabjous-day/)