Last week, the Treasury Department introduced its new $100 bill, a redesign intended to frustrate high-tech counterfeiters when it goes into circulation Feb. 10.

The $100 bill, a favorite of forgers, is not only the highest-value denomination in general circulation, but also the most widely distributed and most counterfeited outside the United States.

Perhaps anticipating the criticism that accompanies anything new, a special-effects-laden �unveiling� video released by Treasury reveals a sensuously undulating $100 note as it enumerates the bill's security features.

But how does the look of the new $100 bill compare with its predecessor?

BENJAMIN FRANKLIN
Old: The off-center oval is too large andunbalanced.
New: Adding Franklin's shoulders and removingthe background avoids the unbalanced look.

COLOR
Old: The green is elegantly traditional.
New: The shifting-colored hues gives the bill amodern aesthetic.

BACKGROUND AND WATERMARKS
Old: Subtle.
New: Too many and they look like smudges.

COMPOSITION
Old: Comparatively simple, yet the seals, type and othergraphic elements seem disjointed and appear random.
New: Many obtrusive graphic elements, including thesecurity bars and watermarks, yet curiously the overalldesign is more unified.

SECURITY RIBBON AND THREAD
Old: Not there.
New: Necessarily obtrusive. Gives theimpression of a credit card or money order.

FILIGREE (THE BORDER AROUND THE BILL)
Old: Classic application gives the note anofficial banknote aesthetic.
New: Reductivist and minimal applicationlightens the note and implies modernity butcould unwittingly suggest deflation.

NUMERALS
Old: Well positioned in relation to filigree.
New: Smaller is better, but the numbers are notwell integrated into the filigree, making themlook like an afterthought.

BELL IN INKWELL (IN ORANGE)
Old: Not there.
New: Playful and unnecessary.

DENOMINATION IN WORDS
Old: Elegantly composed as part of the filigree.
New: Squeezed too close to Franklin's forehead.

SERIAL NUMBERS
Old: Clear and unencumbered.
New: Harder to read against watermarks andsomewhat less legible for players of liar's poker.

To read the complete article, see:Anatomy of a Benjamin(www.nytimes.com/2010/04/25/weekinreview/25considered.html)