After publishing the link to our first E-Sylum readers survey last week, responses immediately began rolling in - nearly 100 by 5:30am Monday. One reader encountered a problem, though. Yossi Dotan writes:

My apologies for the oversight, which I corrected. I used a free tool in Google Docs, and borrowed the country list from another user's survey so I wouldn't have to retype a 200+ entry list. I did end up hand-entering the 50 U.S. states. But despite the problems the survey seemed to work well.

The rule of thumb for direct response is that a 3% response rate is excellent. We got over four times that, and responses were still coming in Friday morning. I compiled these results Friday evening.

We are a diverse bunch. Although most responses (88%) came from the United States, we had responses from 14 different countries, includingAustralia, Belgium, Canada, China, France, Ireland, Israel, Mexico, New Zealand, South Africa, Taiwan, the United Kingdom and Vietnam.

Within the U.S., we have readers in Alaska, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida,Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana,Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana,Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia,Wisconsin, Wyoming and Washington, D.C.

As for NBS membership, it was about a 40/60 split - 40% of respondents were NBS members, 60% were not. Remember, while The E-Sylum is free to all, only NBS members receive our print journal, The Asylum.

The overwhelming majority of readers (some 82%) access The E-Sylum via email. About 10% read it on the NBS web site. Much smaller numbers (from 1% to 3%) report using other options, which include theSmartphone app,RSS, Facebook andGoogle+.Some readers access The E-Sylum by up to three different methods.

Thanks to everyone who participated. Were these results what you expected? And now that we have our first survey under our belts, perhaps we can plan others in the future. What questions should we ask? What would you like to learn from our readers?

Email has generally been a pretty good delivery mechanism, but there are always a few that at least occasionally report not getting their copy of the issue. We had a few copies go missing this week, and one was Harvey Stack's.

Harvey writes:

I don't know about the 175M number, but the 30,000 ANA members are a ripe target. 1,600+ readers isn't too shabby for a fairly specialized publication like The E-Sylum, but we can always do better.Anyone interested enough in the hobby to join the national club ought to find something of interest in The E-Sylum. If we were to reach only 10% of ANA's membership we could nearly double our readership.